.
Feedback

Zero Dark Thirty: A Seamless Weaving of Fact and Fiction

Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal have created a runaway train of a movie regarding the hunt for Osama bin Laden.

"Zero Dark Thirty" was generating controversy long before it hit movie theatres nationwide on Friday.

Director-producer Kathryn Bigelow and writer-producer Mark Boal were criticized for their depiction of CIA agents torturing inmates for information leading to the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden.

The movie claims to be factual, and yet the CIA insists that torture wasn't part of the mix.

Bigelow and Boal are also accused of allegedly obtaining classified information, which they, of course, claim they didn't.

The movie follows a CIA female operative, Maya (Jessica Chastain), over the 10 years the U.S. hunted for Osama Bin Laden. She survives bombings and attacks, pouring over her computer and trying to assemble a coherent argument about Bin Laden's whereabouts.

We know the end of the story: she did.

Here's what the critics are saying:

Yet more essential, at least for this discussion, is that “Zero Dark Thirty” is also one of the most innovative and best-made films of the past year. Every now and then, even Dick Cheney gets to like a great movie. Like Bigelow's Oscar-winning “The Hurt Locker,” “Zero Dark Thirty” has a measured but jittery pace, a pulse to the camera work that creates the sense of seeing the world through the eyes of someone methodical, observant and tense. The eye hovers, takes in every detail and expects the worst. Bigelow has an ability that few filmmakers have, one that Hitchcock had — the ability to make an audience nervous even when nothing bad is happening.--Mick LaSalle, May San Antonio.com

... Most of the movie is about American defeat—the failure to capture or kill Osama bin Laden, as Al Qaeda pulls off attacks in Saudi Arabia, Britain, and Pakistan. “Zero Dark Thirty” chronicles a long trail of frustration, leading to fragmentary gains and, at last, to success, on the night of May 1, 2011: Operation Neptune’s Spear, a Navy SEALs siege of bin Laden’s hideout in Abbottabad, which is so perfectly executed that it almost defies normal skepticism about the way life works. The virtue of “Zero Dark Thirty,” however, is that it pays close attention to the way life does work; it combines ruthlessness and humanity in a manner that is paradoxical and disconcerting yet satisfying as art. David Denby, The New Yorker

...I'm torn about considering it a great movie, though, and even more hesitant to say that it is successful thematically. The film's best moments may be its last few seconds, which wrenchingly bring light to Maya as a character, but if it can't resonate until it's over, is it working a piece of a cinema? Zero Dark Thirty is a virtuosic display of skill from Bigelow, and features excellent performances from all of its actors. I recommend that you go see it, and I encourage you to enjoy it. But I'm not sure that Zero, even as a film more technically and artistically compelling than The Hurt Locker, manages to exceed the latter in electrifying power. --Rachel Wilson, Policymic

It's frankly incredible that, in the middle of such a complicated story, Zero Dark Thirty presents such a complex character in Maya, a tough woman in an impossible job who sidesteps every imaginable possible cliche. Everything about her, from the way she wears a scarf over her head when interrogating a detainee to the false smiles she gives to put powerful men at ease, speaks to her unusual position as a woman in the Middle East, but that contrast never becomes text, just another fascinating layer in a story with no simple conclusions. Not all of the characters around her are equally as complex-- Chris Pratt, Harold Perrineau and Joel Edgerton are just a few of the big names who are gone as soon as they arrive-- but Jennifer Ehle, Kyle Chandler, James Gandolfini and especially Clarke all make their impact, though all somewhat overshadowed by the powerhouse that is Chastian. Like the woman at its center, Zero Dark Thirty exudes a constant, quiet confidence, telling a story with an ending we all know and making it feel thrilling, suspenseful, and completely vital.--Katey Rich, Cinemablend.com

A seamless weave of truth and drama, "Zero Dark Thirty" tracks the long, twisted road to Bin Laden's capture, beginning on Sept. 11 and ending a decade later at another conflagration, in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Wight a script by Mark Boal, who wrote "The Hurt Locker," Ms. Bigelow’s last feature, this new movie is a cool, outwardly nonpartisan intelligence procedural — a detective story of sorts — in which a mass murderer is tracked down by people who spend a lot of time staring into computer screens and occasionally working in the field. It is also a wrenchingly sad, soul-shaking story about revenge and its moral costs, which makes it the most important American fiction movie about Sept. 11, a landmark that would be more impressive if there were more such films to choose from. --Manohla Dargis, New York Times

"Zero Dark Thirty" is rated R for violence and language. It runs 2 hours and 37 minutes. In addition to Jessica Chastain, the movie stars Jason Clarke, Joel Edgerton, Chris Pratt, Kyle Chandler, and Mark Strong

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Northeast Cobb Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Teos June 4, 2013 at 01:19 pm
Louise although I do not follow your faith, I appreciate your understanding about being inclusiveRead More for everyone in this country, rather than just the ones you want to include.
Helmut June 4, 2013 at 04:08 pm
If you follow Christ’s teachings then you must acknowledge that the sole domain for sex is theRead More married man and woman. One of the problems in our society is the acceptance of (or participation in) a behavior simply because we find out that someone we like participates in that behavior. Whether it is a teenager who thinks doing illegal drugs is OK because their best friend does it, or those who now accept homosexuality because they have discovered a family member or friend is homosexual. One can still love the other person without embracing the particular activity. As St. Augustine wrote in the "City of God" - "the character of human will is important...since no one is evil by nature, but whoever is evil is evil by vice, whoever lives according to God should hold a perfect hatred for evil men. He should not hate the man because of his vice, or love the vice because of the man."
Harry Cooter June 4, 2013 at 06:56 pm
The reason that they call you bigots is because you are bigots. Look the word up in the dictionary.
HeartDoc Andrew May 5, 2013 at 09:07 am
is reminded that GOD can and has saved us from the attacks of terrorists as evident by our writingRead More and posting comments here :-) Suggest reading: Psalm 127:1 and Philippians 4:6-7 :-)
Charles Schwable May 7, 2013 at 04:12 am
I guess not since Boston marathon incident, terror from within USA is prevalent.
HeartDoc Andrew May 5, 2013 at 07:40 am
is able (Philippians 4:13) to help his daughter as much as she needs with all glory to GOD :-) LausRead More Deo :-) http://WDJW.net/LausDeo :-)
Charles Schwable April 28, 2013 at 09:29 am
I'd say heighten our security alert levels for all events nationwide since as a nation we have manyRead More enemies worldwide, including festivals, marathon races, all sporting events, everything were there is a large gathering of people.
Pam J April 28, 2013 at 03:07 pm
I don't think there is any way to stop these things from happening. Or just stop everybody who hasRead More a backpack. There really is no way to watch everybody. There is a fine line between surveillance and rights to privacy and civil rights.
HeartDoc Andrew April 29, 2013 at 01:00 am
shares that the easy (Matthew 11:30) way to make sure our neighbors around us are in a right stateRead More of mind (i.e. neither homicidal or suicidal) is by simply asking them how they're doing and persisting past the "pat answer" to determining if they are able to say they are "wonderfully hungry" because homicdal/suicidal people cannot say they are "wonderfully hungry" because they'd definitely **not** be looking forward to their next meal. Those interested in learning more about this can view the hour-long network TV interview still airing at 11alive.com --> http://www.11alive.com/news/comments.aspx?storyid=251415
stephen m george jr mpa May 13, 2013 at 09:03 pm
A better question would be, why do theKSU police department need M-60 machine guns? And have theRead More KSU police department received training the the proper methodology for tactical use of a crew served weapon? An M-60 machine gun is not a sniper weapon; it is designed for use against troops, plural, in the open field. But what the heck ...let's go ahead and issue them a flame thrower and a couple dozen hand grenades as well!
Marlene Mitchell May 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
How many M-60's do they have?
stephen m george jr mpa May 13, 2013 at 10:34 pm
Several ...a few years ago I had the opportunity to visit the Arms Room at the KSU policeRead More department.
Helen E April 14, 2013 at 04:36 pm
In 1997, when the number "42" was universally retired, 13 active players were wearing theRead More number and were allowed to keep using it until they left baseball. Mariano Rivera, the consummate closer for the NY Yankees, is the last player in Major League Baseball wearing Jackie Robinson’s No. 42. He will retire at the end of this season...and Robinson's number will also be retired.
Janet April 15, 2013 at 12:09 am
This movie was great!
Daniel Tewfik April 17, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Retiring Jackie's number was huge. I created a visualization of MLB teams who have retired numbersRead More (including 42). Check it out: http://bit.ly/14wUpGq
Debra April 13, 2013 at 10:33 pm
No, The banks should not loan money to people that have lesser credit. Stick to your 700 creditRead More score. If you don't (banks) it will all come back to bite you in the a--. You will be blamed for another crash and you will most likely face charges etc. this time. They could shut down the banks that make these loans, lose your jobs,etc. It could be a lot worse the second time around. There is nothing wrong with renting a house. People can make it a home until they can afford to buy without such a struggle. Besides jobs are not secure for anyone right now. As for the banks, it's too much of a risk. Owning a home is not what gets the economy going anyway, it's JOBS that get the economy going, Top and foremost!!
Christopher Baldwin April 14, 2013 at 12:39 pm
I was highly involved in the Real Estate Business during the rise & crash of our Market. IRead More highly suspected during that time period that we would see enormous filings of Foreclosures & Bankruptcies. Unfortunately I didn't read the writing on the wall as clearly as I should have and held onto assets that I should have cashed out of. We can't keep doing the same thing and expecting different results. Giving away homes & loans to buyers with nothing invested on their end will not be a long term productive process. Habitat for Humanity applies a very good system to buyers that don't have good credit or money to invest. They set up very strict guidelines and the buyer actually invest time & effort in the building of their homes. Their interest charge is minimal if any at all but they must follow the rules set up. And these are truly "Starter Homes" not something more expensive than they can afford. That's what needs to be promoted and not us as tax payers having to pull everyone else up without any investment on their side of the equation.
Mark Obrien April 14, 2013 at 05:41 pm
No! Are you kidding me? Hasn't this nightmare of an economy been bad enough to say the least toRead More start over doing something that failed totally before? People bought homes without any hard money invested on their own. All they had to do was go to some "class" for first time buyers and they were given money to buy a house. Did they invest anything but their monthly payments? No. So when they lost their job or couldn't pay what they agreed to what did they do? They walked away. Same thing would happen again. And also people refinanced homes because prices were skyrocketing. They took out money and bought other things and sometimes other properties. Only to later not be able to sell them later because of what happened in this market. Prices dropped dramatically. We saw homes valued in the 100's of thousands of dollars only to be sold sometimes below $100,000 a few years later. Who made out like bandits after that???? The folks that had cash to go and buy these steals will be able to make lots of cash that the Banks were paid by the Govt to sell. Who i turn was paid for by the Tax Payers. So, my answer is a big fat No. I can only hope & pray that somewhere along the way we will get some Common Sense in our thinking.
Greg April 8, 2013 at 11:36 am
NO!!!! Are you kidding me? The Federal Government already collects more money than they need to.Read More They need to go through each department and agency and start cutting out programs that are not needed or duplicated. Then they need to cut the elected officials budgets, have them live with less. IMF is wanting the US to donate more money to their cause so they can give it away to other countries. Doesn't the US give enough money to most of these other countries anyway? And what do we get from it for the most part? Nothing.
William Compton April 9, 2013 at 05:15 pm
They need to keep their nose in their own business
Debra April 10, 2013 at 05:50 am
NO!!!!!!!!!!!! NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY GAS NOW AS ITRead More IS!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW WILL PEOPLE GET TO THEIR JOBS TO MAKE A PAYCHECK TO PUT FOOD ON THE TABLE TO FEED THEIR CHILDREN!!!!!!!! AND EVERY TIME GAS GOES UP ---FOOD PRICES GO UP!!!!!!!! WHY DOES OUR GOVERNMENT WANT TO SEND US TO OUR DEATHS BY SLOW STARVATION!!!!!!!! HORRIBLE WAY TO GO!!!!! BUT WHATS WORSE THAN THAT IS WATCHING YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN SLOWLY DIE FROM STARVATION RIGHT BEFORE YOUR EYES!!!!!!!!CRIMES WILL BE OUT OF CONTROL!!!!!!! STEALING FOOD, GAS, ETC. YOU WILL THINK YOU WENT TO BED IN AMERICA AND WOKE UP IN A 3rd WORLD COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!! WHOEVER THOUGHT THIS UP (in our government) REALLY REALLY HATES US AMERICANS!!!!!! OR THEY ARE BADLY OFF THEIR ROCKER AND NEED TO BE COMMITTED TO A MENTAL HOSPITAL RIGHT AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!! I THINK BOTH!!!!!