.
Feedback

Children and Tattoos

Tattooing has become common in pop culture. This form of self expression is illegal in children under 18 in Georgia and various other states.

. In Georgia, it is illegal to tattoo a person age 17 or younger. Parental consent is inconsequential. The fact that this child was tattooed speaks volumes regarding the ability to get a tattoo under the age of 18. I did notice that his mother's mug shot clearly displays a tattoo upon her neck. I have always pointed out that children mimic what they see. One only needs to look at professional athletes and one can see an endless array of "body art." We know that children idolize sports heroes, which brings us to ask these two questions:

       1. "What is a hero?"

       2. "How accountable should our sports icons be regarding behaviors both on and off the field?"

The first question is a matter of opinion. The second question has more implications since we know that children emulate their role models. The fact that this 10-year-old’s mother surrendered her parental duty and allowed her child to receive a tattoo is an example of poor judgment and an example of parents being a friend to the child instead of a parent. I recently took care of a patient whose mother had several tattoos on her breast, which made her unable to breast feed her infant. Her response to not being able to suckle her infant was “the tattoo artist didn't tell me that I couldn't breast feed" and my response was “the tattoo artist wasn't concerned about your parenting abilities." As I always mention, it is incumbent upon the parents to be their child's advocate and put their children first (because an unscrupulous tattoo artist won't).

Tattooing has existed for centuries. The name is derived from the tapping sound made by the needle puncturing the skin. In Polynesian cultures, tattooing was a symbol of social stature. In the U.S., current pop culture would lead one to believe the same social strata apply. A Harris poll reported that 16 percent of Americans have tattoos. In a 2006 study, researchers reported that among 18 to 50-year-olds, 24 percent of this age group sported a tattoo. A study by Urdang, Mallek and Mallon (2011) stated that people with tattoos were likely to be less educated, indulged in high rates of recreational drug use and were less likely to show religious affiliations. Catholicism and Judaism prohibit their faithful from tattooing. In 2007, researchers Burris and Kim reported that 50 percent of persons with tattoos expressed regret. On average, the buyer’s regret occurred 14 years after the actual tattooing event. One study in 1998 correlated tattoos with sensation seeking behaviors.

The Internet is full of websites dedicated to this form of "body art." In fact, one such website www.BMEzine.com voluntarily asked its viewers to take part in a poll. The results of this unscientific research were interesting at best. Male participants were found to have suicidal ideation at a rate of 36.6 percent and 19.5 percent had attempted suicide. In female participants, 40.8 percent reported having suicidal ideation and 33.3 percent had attempted suicide.

The point in mentioning all these scientific and non-scientific studies is to call attention to risk taking behaviors in which adolescents seem to gravitate. Teens can also be impulsive and be influenced by peers more easily than adults. The pressure to fit in and be current can be overwhelming. An unscrupulous tattoo artist will be more than willing to apply their trade to a child's body canvas. It is up to parents to discuss this current trend with adolescents. Just because tattooing under the age of 18 is illegal, it does not mean that it isn't available. The tattooed 10-year-old is proof of accessibility. Underground tattoo artists deal only in cash and they tend to change their venues to avoid arrest.

The risk of tattooing especially in hidden, un-regulated parlors with improperly sterilized tattooing instruments includes the following:

  • Hepatitis B, C, D and E
  • HIV or AIDS
  • MRSA (methicillin resistant staph aureus or other staph infections.)
  • STDs
  • Infection from other forms of bacteria
  • Endocarditis

There are more side effects, but these are just a few.

Of course, the mode of transmission is through the use of dirty needles that have been used on previous clients, who are infected with an illness. It is estimated that 2-3 percent of tattoos are associated with complications. Regulated tattoo parlors must adhere to strict regulation according to current health code regulations. With new techniques on tattoo removal, one must remember that the tattoo may not be permanent but some of these life threatening illnesses certainly are. Stay well.

Should parents have the right to get their children tattoos? Vote in the poll below and tell us why, or why not, in the Comment Box.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Northeast Cobb Patch? Find your Local Patch »

slimshady2108 February 5, 2012 at 09:21 pm
Way to do your research...Catholicism does NOT prohibit tattoos! I'm Catholic, tattooed, not into drugs (or other risk taking behaviors), not suicidal, or any of the other stuff you claim tattooed people do.
http://cuf.org/faithfacts/details_view.asp?ffID=233
Phillip Duke February 6, 2012 at 07:18 pm
right on slimshaddy
no research done here,
Marilyn Kontrafouris-Eleftheriou RN,MN February 8, 2012 at 01:31 am
The fact is there is an association with high risk behaviors and tattoos. This does not mean that all tattooed individuals fall into high risk categories.The studies that I have referred to are easily accessible and I have mentioned that one is a non-scientific study from a tattoo website. Judaism and Catholicism frown upon tattooing.
slimshady2108 February 8, 2012 at 06:02 am
@Phillip Duke Nothing but respect to you sir. Lucky Draw is the ONLY shop I go to!
@ Marilyn...You could say that about almost anything. There is an association between people who grow up in the projects and high risk behaviors. However, it is WRONG to stereotype all people living in poverty just as it is WRONG to stereotype people with tattoos as you have done. You clearly did not read the article I posted. If the tattoos are sinful in nature, the naturally they would be frowned upon. However, if the tattoos do not lead the person or others away from God, there's not a problem. You would be surprised to learn that there are may people who are devout Catholics who have tattoos that GLORIFY GOD! I have a Bible verse tattoo and have never felt "frowned upon" by anyone in my CATHOLIC church community. Please reconsider your narrow-mindedness and realize that tattoos are becoming mainstream and no longer carry the stigmas they once did.
Tina Barnes February 9, 2012 at 05:18 pm
This is a very generalized article. Are there links available to these "studies"? You can't quote statistics without a clear background of the study that was carried out. You must provide the context of the study, and not just the results. I find it funny that the article contradicts itself, stating that tattooing has been around for centuries and, in the next paragraph, calling tattooing a "current trend". It is apparent that the article was written by someone with no personal knowledge of tattooing, the industry or, for that matter, people with tattoos. The article would have been better written by someone who knows the subject. As for the comment about certain religions forbidding tattoos, this is a topic specific to each religion. The Bible itself only has one verse that forbids "marking your body" and that is Leviticus 19:28. Again, even that must be taken in context.
Tommy Jones February 9, 2012 at 05:22 pm
The problem with studies like that is the results tell only half the story. You can analyze the common traits of people with tattoos all day long, but that doesn't provide any evidence that getting a tattoo is some sort of gateway to debauchery. As a (generally) permanent form of self expression, it is less common than wearing a hat with the logo of your favorite sports team. Tattoos often mark important milestones, honor loved ones, or advertise religious affiliation. Tattoos are a commitment, and they reflect commitment. The pain of getting a tattoo can many times be paralleled with the pain of the life experiences that deserve commemoration. Tattoos do not lead to drugs or suicide. Tattoos scream loud and clear, "I'm still alive!"
Tattoos do not precede hard times. They are badges of honor and merits of survival. Now. Children? No way. Wear a hat with the logo of your favorite sports team until you turn 18.
Tommy Jones February 9, 2012 at 05:36 pm
Oh, and I forgot to mention that I'm 28 and I don't have a single tattoo or piercing. Yet.
I also was participating in the discussion more than responding to the article. Losing an older brother at 8 years old is a horrible experience and a fantastic reason to get a tattoo. But in my opinion, that should have waited another 8 years.
kenny February 9, 2012 at 05:49 pm
For starters, you don't judge a book by it's cover. Body art doesn't make a person! It doesn't matter weather ur a sports star or a teacher. People make their own decisions. Weather its the wright one or not is completely up to them. It's the same as blaming someone else for your addiction. To sum this up, under eighteen no! Why? Because they can't make rational decisions on there own. If a child does come home with one and u didn't know that it happened is that still your fault?
kenny February 9, 2012 at 05:51 pm
Who really cares what someone else thinks! Ur not to judge. The law is the law. If you knowingly let your child get a tattoo under age then its your tail.
Phillip Duke February 9, 2012 at 05:58 pm
WHY DO YOU KEEP TAKING THIS COMMENT DOWN!
Tina Barnes February 9, 2012 at 06:01 pm
Oh yes, children under 18 - no way. For the same reason Kenny stated.
Marilyn Kontrafouris-Eleftheriou RN,MN February 9, 2012 at 09:11 pm
I have not mentioned that there is a growing concern that extreme tattooing may lead to certain forms of cancers because of the ink used. Breast feeding is prohibited when the tattoo is on the breast because the ink can bleed into the milk duct causing poisoning. Remember that this article is on the tattooing of children.
Tommy Jones February 14, 2012 at 11:17 pm
"Remember that this article is on the tattooing of children." Barely. Yes, the headline of the article is "Children and Tattoos", but let's take a closer look.
The article has 776 words. The first 197 words are about children and tattoos. The next 85 words are expressing the author's opinion that tattoo artists only care about getting paid to tattoo their clients and have no concern for health and safety. The next 359 words detail the common risk taking behaviors among the tattooed, including suicidal thoughts. The assumption is made that people who get tattoos will wind up on a path of self destruction. The only possible fair conclusion to draw from this data is that people who were dealt a poor hand in life often get tattoos - not the other way around.
Tommy Jones February 14, 2012 at 11:17 pm
The final 135 words express the concern of health risks associated with improperly managed tattoo shops, which extends past the age of the clients and should be carefully researched by anyone planning to get a tattoo. Yes, clearly it is likely that an artist willing to tattoo a 10 year old is "unscrupulous" and operating in an unsafe environment, but this has nothing to do with whether or not it should be legal for a 10 year old to get a tattoo. It only means that if a tattoo is received illegally, that it is probably not sterile and could pose a health risk.
If the article is about whether or not tattooing children under 18 should be legal, the article missed the point with about 75% being irrelevant to the headline.
Phillip Duke February 16, 2012 at 06:01 pm
Get em tommy...way to go sir!!
she has no clue "cant breast feed with a tattooed tit " LOL inform yourself Marilyn Kontrafouris-Eleftheriou RN,MN quit spreading rumors your talking out your A$$
Marilyn Kontrafouris-Eleftheriou RN,MN February 17, 2012 at 03:32 pm
The main point of this article is to educate the reader that tattoooing in people under 18 years of age is illegal. As with all illegal activities, risks are involved. Parents are still in charge of their minor children. It is parental duty to keep their children out of harms way, teach children to obey their rules( parental) and laws and educate their children about risk taking behaviors. Failure to do so can result in disaster and I am not merely speaking about tattooing. Read my article on effective parenting. Being a proactive parent is extremely important to raising a well adjusted child.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Teos June 4, 2013 at 01:19 pm
Louise although I do not follow your faith, I appreciate your understanding about being inclusiveRead More for everyone in this country, rather than just the ones you want to include.
Helmut June 4, 2013 at 04:08 pm
If you follow Christ’s teachings then you must acknowledge that the sole domain for sex is theRead More married man and woman. One of the problems in our society is the acceptance of (or participation in) a behavior simply because we find out that someone we like participates in that behavior. Whether it is a teenager who thinks doing illegal drugs is OK because their best friend does it, or those who now accept homosexuality because they have discovered a family member or friend is homosexual. One can still love the other person without embracing the particular activity. As St. Augustine wrote in the "City of God" - "the character of human will is important...since no one is evil by nature, but whoever is evil is evil by vice, whoever lives according to God should hold a perfect hatred for evil men. He should not hate the man because of his vice, or love the vice because of the man."
Harry Cooter June 4, 2013 at 06:56 pm
The reason that they call you bigots is because you are bigots. Look the word up in the dictionary.
HeartDoc Andrew May 5, 2013 at 09:07 am
is reminded that GOD can and has saved us from the attacks of terrorists as evident by our writingRead More and posting comments here :-) Suggest reading: Psalm 127:1 and Philippians 4:6-7 :-)
Charles Schwable May 7, 2013 at 04:12 am
I guess not since Boston marathon incident, terror from within USA is prevalent.
HeartDoc Andrew May 5, 2013 at 07:40 am
is able (Philippians 4:13) to help his daughter as much as she needs with all glory to GOD :-) LausRead More Deo :-) http://WDJW.net/LausDeo :-)
Charles Schwable April 28, 2013 at 09:29 am
I'd say heighten our security alert levels for all events nationwide since as a nation we have manyRead More enemies worldwide, including festivals, marathon races, all sporting events, everything were there is a large gathering of people.
Pam J April 28, 2013 at 03:07 pm
I don't think there is any way to stop these things from happening. Or just stop everybody who hasRead More a backpack. There really is no way to watch everybody. There is a fine line between surveillance and rights to privacy and civil rights.
HeartDoc Andrew April 29, 2013 at 01:00 am
shares that the easy (Matthew 11:30) way to make sure our neighbors around us are in a right stateRead More of mind (i.e. neither homicidal or suicidal) is by simply asking them how they're doing and persisting past the "pat answer" to determining if they are able to say they are "wonderfully hungry" because homicdal/suicidal people cannot say they are "wonderfully hungry" because they'd definitely **not** be looking forward to their next meal. Those interested in learning more about this can view the hour-long network TV interview still airing at 11alive.com --> http://www.11alive.com/news/comments.aspx?storyid=251415
stephen m george jr mpa May 13, 2013 at 09:03 pm
A better question would be, why do theKSU police department need M-60 machine guns? And have theRead More KSU police department received training the the proper methodology for tactical use of a crew served weapon? An M-60 machine gun is not a sniper weapon; it is designed for use against troops, plural, in the open field. But what the heck ...let's go ahead and issue them a flame thrower and a couple dozen hand grenades as well!
Marlene Mitchell May 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
How many M-60's do they have?
stephen m george jr mpa May 13, 2013 at 10:34 pm
Several ...a few years ago I had the opportunity to visit the Arms Room at the KSU policeRead More department.
Helen E April 14, 2013 at 04:36 pm
In 1997, when the number "42" was universally retired, 13 active players were wearing theRead More number and were allowed to keep using it until they left baseball. Mariano Rivera, the consummate closer for the NY Yankees, is the last player in Major League Baseball wearing Jackie Robinson’s No. 42. He will retire at the end of this season...and Robinson's number will also be retired.
Janet April 15, 2013 at 12:09 am
This movie was great!
Daniel Tewfik April 17, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Retiring Jackie's number was huge. I created a visualization of MLB teams who have retired numbersRead More (including 42). Check it out: http://bit.ly/14wUpGq